Majority of General Counsel Believe a Recession Is Coming in the Next 2 Years
Seventy-six percent of chief legal officers believe that a recession is coming in the next two years and that is impacting their overall budgets, according to the 2019 Chief Legal Officer Survey published by Altman Weil on Tuesday.
November 12, 2019 at 05:36 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Seventy-six percent of chief legal officers believe a recession is coming in the next two years and that is impacting their overall budgets, according to the 2019 Chief Legal Officer Survey published by Altman Weil Inc. on Tuesday.
The author's report, James Wilber, a principal at Altman Weil, said in an interview that this was the first year the survey included a question about the recession. He said it is too early to be a part of a trend; however, the decrease in outside counsel spend and hiring is an indicator of an oncoming recession.
"The context of the 2019 survey, conducted in September and October 2019, includes a greater measure of economic uncertainty than in recent years, arising from the threat of a recession, unpredictable trade policy and a more volatile geopolitical environment," Wilber said in the report.
Forty percent of law departments increased their total budgets for 2019, according to the report. This number is down from the 53% of respondents who said their budgets increased in 2018. According to the report, 38% of law departments decreased overall spending. In 2018, only 29% of respondents decreased their overall spending.
Additionally, legal departments have "reversed course" on outside counsel spend from 2018 to 2019. In 2018, 42% of respondents indicated they increased spending on outside counsel. This year, only 27% of respondents said their legal departments increased outside counsel spending.
While outside counsel spend has decreased, 36% of respondents indicated they will increase the number of lawyers in the legal department in the next 12 months and 9% of respondents indicated their departments plan to make cuts. The report said the number of departments planning increases in their workforce has decreased from 42% in 2018.
"This pullback on law firm spending may reflect the results of doing more work in-house, the use of lower-priced firms or non-firm alternatives, renegotiated rate packages, or some combination of these and other cost-control efforts," Wilber said in the report.
Part of those cost-controlling efforts includes the implementation of legal operations. The number of legal departments that have hired a legal operations manager has gone up from 39% in 2018 to 46% in 2019.
"Having a legal operations manager has been an important and growing trend in the last five to six years," Wilber said. "If they're [legal departments] are looking at it is an investment that will save them money in the long run, if done right, it will happen."
Wilber said he would expect the number of respondents who hired legal operations professionals in the coming years to grow because legal operations is proving to be an effective cost-saving measure.
The survey was sent to 977 law departments in September and October with 238 in-house legal leaders responding to the survey.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Seek Redo of First Trial Over Medical Device Plant's Emissions
4 minute readIn Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250